Do these show the likelihood that Evolution is happening now and forever, or is god updating his creations?
The human preference for large snow lotus plants, which are used in traditional Tibetan and Chinese medicine, has meant that only the smaller plants go to seed. Hence, the snow lotus is getting smaller.
In another example, scientists have found that human preference for trophy game such as big fish and caribou is driving these species to become smaller and reproduce at younger ages.
A population of tropical butterflies on a South Pacific island evolved resistance to a killer bacteria in the span of a single year. That is a split second in evolutionary time. The bacteria infects females and selectively kills males before they hatch. This reduced male Blue Moon butterflies to just 1 percent of the population. But just 10 generations later – a year’s time – males made up nearly 40 percent of the population. Scientists said the rebound is due to the evolution of a so-called suppressor gene that keeps the killer bacteria in check. The butterflies which generated this gene survived, and they procreated.
A toxic toad, introduced in 1936 to wipe out a beetle species wreaking havoc on Australia’s sugar cane crop, has become pest itself, evolving longer legs to help it hop across the country at an constantly increasing speed. For their first 20 years in the country, they spread at a pace of 6 miles per year. They now move at about 30 miles per year. Researchers found that the toads leading the cross-country march had legs that were 6 percent longer than those of the stragglers. The added length gives more speed, which permits the long-legged toads to secure the best habitat at the newly conquered terrain.
Flounder, sole, halibut and other flatfish have long been an evolutionary oddity. Both their eyes are on the same side of the head; an adaptation that allows them to lie flat on the ocean bottom while keeping their eyes on the lookout for passing prey. Opponents of evolution said that this could not have evolved gradually, as suggested by Natural Selection. That’s because there would be no advantage for an intermediate form. But now, scientists have found those intermediate forms in museum collections. The 50 million-year-old fossils have a partially displaced eye.
Australian lizards, called skinks, are dropping their limbs to become more like snakes. Some skinks have gone ‘snake’ in just 3.6 million years, relatively fast in evolutionary time. The skinks’ lifestyle appears to be driving the change. They spend most of their time navigating through sand or soil. Limbs are not only unnecessary for this, they may be a hindrance.
Humans are rapidly evolving, too. As people adapt to different regions, cultures and diets, they are becoming increasingly different from people elsewhere. For example, Europeans have evolved a tolerance for dairy products into adulthood, whereas people in China and most of Africa have not.

You lost me at “chinese medicine”
No such things as evolution.
You are preaching to the choir and screaming in a vacuum.
YEC do not reach conclusions after examining evidence, but rather mine “evidence” that seem to back up their ideological presuppositions.
But my 2,000 year old book said some guy I’ve never seen snapped his fingers and made all that happen.
Beat that!
Why would a god update something that is perfect?
And yet they still won’t see changes as intermediary steps to something else in the long term. It’s just easier for them to ignore it…
Well I don’t have time for all of the things you pointed out so let me just address the first one. The snow lotus you say is becoming smaller. Is that snow lotus becoming something OTHER than a snow lotus, albeit a smaller version of itself. No.
And to your last point. Are humans becoming something other than human? I still have nothing but thumbs down with no answer to this simple question. Let’s say I leave a dirty, smog filled city where I have asthma attacks on a regular basis and suffer from serious allergies and move to a nice clean city, maybe another country where the air is clean and fresh. Suddenly my asthma and allergies are gone. Did I just evolve into something other than a human being or did my body adapt to it’s new environment. To point to one species adapting to a new environment or need and saying it’s proof of evolution is a smoke screen, IMO.
Evolution is the interaction between genetic mutations and the effect of those mutations have on the fecundity of the beings who bear them.
If organisms alter their environment, knowingly or unknowingly, they alter the effect of mutations on the beings who carry them.
I don’t think there has ever been any question about mutations within a species, or simple adaptation, over time.
Then there are the classic melanistic moths, the increase in tuskless African elephants, or the chicken embryo with reptile teeth.
Not to mention all those fossils, the genetics, the patterns in morphology, embryology, and the simple location of animals.
The amount of data you have to ignore to reject evolution is astonishing, yet some people still manage it.
They all support the Theory of Evolution, in that they follow the predictions that it makes. This is an excellent collection of facts. The last part of the question, “now and forever,” is a bit of a misstatement. Nothing concerning the future can be ‘proven’ beyond a shadow of a doubt. We can only determine what is most likely to be true. Even the Theory of Gravity is subject to this rule, but that does little to minimize its usefulness.
Most of what you are saying could be examples of micro evolution, something that Christians don’t necessarily disagree with. In other words the Flounder, is still a flounder, it is not becoming a moose. The toad, growing longer legs, is still a toad. This is micro, not Macro evolution.
I am not buying lizards are becoming snakes, because guaranteed, there is no fossil record to prove this.
If evolution was true we would have thousands of other animals in transformation to a new species. Species are always the same species, that don’t change into something else.
A horse can “evolve” into a donkey, because they are the same “kind” as the bible puts it.
I MUST "buy" that lizards have become (one, long ago, not now) snakes, because, guaranteed, there ARE fossils –several — that demonstrate this. There are also a huge number of anatomical similarities, including the vestigial limbs still present in many old-lineage snakes, such as pythons and boas. And heck, even Genesis says that God zapped the snake (Presumably with another snap of his fingers, as ?Said put it) to take away its legs and henceforth crawl on its belly.
And a horse is the same "kind" as a donkey? Forgive me, but what do you put in your coffee? Have you ever tried to run derby on a donkey?
Finally, why is a "2,000 year old book" written by numerous fallible humans supposed to be believed when the simple parlour game of telephone so amply demonstrates that humans can't send a correct version of a massage around a circle of eight players? How, then, can anyone assume perfection in a book that went through scores of original authors, tens of languages, and thousands of scribes over 20 centuries? Methinks that the ego of humanity has reached a perilou height of unmitigated arrogance. Again.