Vegetables: “Full sun” vs. actual sunlight?

Question by Mark:
Vegetables: “Full sun” vs. actual sunlight?

I live in a part of California where the sun pretty much always shines in the summer. So lets say I’m trying to grow a vegetable that requires “full sun”. Obviously during peak hours needed for growth, many parts of the U.S. will not experience our fairly reliable sunshine. So where they do fine with 6-8 hours of frequently cloudy skies, can we get by in a spot with fewer hours of theoretical sunshine (say 4-6) yet as many actual hours of sunshine and still raise happy “full sun” vegetables?

In other words, is it the total actual sunshine that matters, or the total possible sunshiine?

Does the occasional long day make up for consistent but shorter daily sunshine?
Maus,

I’m well aware of that. Here’s a scenario–a spot in Houston can get 8 hours of sun (not too blocked by walls, etc.), yet the sky is only sunny 60% of the time. A spot in California can get 6 hours of sun, and is sunny 100% of the of time. Actual “sunlight” hits the area 4.8 hrs in Houston, 6 hrs. in California. Which is better for full sun vegetables? (assumes clouds block sun 100% for sake of this hypothetical argument, and so on).
Jessica0,

I am indeed looking at areas that get around 4 hours of direct sunlight–but those are right around 11:00 to 3:00 or the ideal times and the sun is pretty much always out (my city even has “sunny” in its name). So as you suggest, I might as well try–nothing lost if it doesn’t work.

I do know that sometimes growers, especially using greenhouses, can speed up growth by increasing the length of daylight. I’ve also heard (can’t guarantee it’s true) that people in Alaska can squeeze in quick summer crops because day length is so long in spite of a short growing season. But presumably day length and light level should be not exactly the same.